One question per note
Why did memory chips crash? Can the power grid keep up with AI? Each note answers one question in plain English, in about five minutes.
YosQuant is one human and a team of AI agents in Indonesia. We read the filings, prices and papers behind the AI boom and turn them into short notes you can check yourself. Every note shows its sources. Every test gets its pass/fail rule before we look. Ideas that fail stay on the record.
Why did memory chips crash? Can the power grid keep up with AI? Each note answers one question in plain English, in about five minutes.
Every note lists the filings, price data and papers it stands on. Facts and opinions are labelled apart, so you can disagree with us on the right thing.
Pass/fail rules are fixed before we see results. When an idea does not hold up, it stays on the record with the reason. It is not quietly dropped.
The script that draws a figure also renders every frame of the film, so it stays sharp on any screen. This 14-second loop was rendered at 3840 × 2160, with no upscaling.
Not ceremony. Three gates that stop a convenient story from dressing itself up as evidence.
Definitions, pass criteria and measurement are written down before the data is opened. If the bar moves after seeing results, the test proves nothing.
A slice of history is sealed during development and opened once, at the end. It is the only honest way to know whether a finding survives outside the room it was born in.
Rejected ideas are kept with the reason they failed. A map of dead ends is an asset—it stops the same money being spent twice.
Speed is not the achievement. With modern tooling, testing is cheap—which means coincidences that look like discoveries are cheap too. The guardrails are the product.
Different assignments, one discipline: make the question explicit, preserve the trail, and keep the limit beside the answer.
Does the rule actually work? We define pass criteria in advance, test against a neutral baseline, and report the limits alongside the result.
Which promotion truly lifted sales. Which signals precede a customer leaving. Whether field activity matches what was written down. Whether a long-standing rule still holds in recent data.
Working instruments, not screenshots: live feeds, automated checks, and interfaces built so a non-technical reader can act on them.
Pipelines where AI does the labour and a human keeps the judgement—with the guardrails that stop speed from producing nonsense.
Money leaves a business quietly: approvals made outside policy, assets idle but still carried on the books, figures that quietly stop reconciling. We rebuild the numbers from source records and show where they diverge—with the trail attached.
These are sanitized views of working research and operating systems—not invented demo data. Identities, private figures and proprietary logic are omitted from the public build.
A four-day behavioural shift in a persistent AI-assisted research system, reconstructed from timestamped logs. Reported as one field observation—not a causal result—with competing explanations left intact.
The live graph scans notes, research, tools and routines into one provenance-aware network. The counts shown are a dated system inventory; private node contents are not part of this page.
A real annual-report chain, normalized so the business structure is visible without publishing a company identity. The private receipt maps every displayed index back to its filed source line.
One source of truth, explicit reconciliation and visible exceptions before a human call. The architecture is real; company identity and every operational figure remain outside the public source.
Public build policy · system-inventory counts and public-filing indices only · no client identity · no private operating figure · no trading data · no proprietary source code
“AI does the labour. A human asks the question, makes the call, and carries the responsibility.”
Most setups invert this—asking a model for judgement while a person does the grunt work. Run the right way round, the gain is not just speed: it is being able to test the boring, unglamorous questions that nobody had hours for before.
Send the question you want settled. If it cannot be answered honestly with the data available, we will say so before any work starts.
[email protected]